In AI we have already found that:

[excerpt from linked article]

"...positive reinforcement leads the model to make more sustainable changes, changes which can become consistent patterns and persist for long periods of time.

In contrast, while negative reinforcement also makes a behavior more likely to occur, it is used for maintaining a minimum performance standard rather than reaching a model’s maximum performance. Negative reinforcement in reinforcement learning can help ensure that a model is kept away from undesirable actions, but it can’t really make a model explore desired actions."

The same applies to people. 

I just realized Vogue Italia is the name of their Italian issue, so Vogue for Palestine, would be called Vogue Falasteen? Did I get the naming convention right? Or would it be Vogue Falstini? Perhaps someone will comment and fill me in...

is there a Vogue Palestine? There should be. I mean there's a Vogue India. Why not a Vogue Palestine? A wonderful way to stand up for human rights without having to deal with arguments and nasty words. Just like any other issue, it's just Vogue Palestine. The illest keffiya patterns on a Palestinian Model. Reviews of the best Knafeh spots. articles about halal dating/courtship -- everything from stuff for married women to so this boy asked for my wali like what???? I'd probably want to have guest dude commentators like dude ask her first before you ask her dad. like articles explaining how like even if ur girl has a mad strict dad that you gotta show her you really love her and you're willing to do everything the right way for her.

I find the topic to be quite fascinating, and it makes me wonder, can humans compute an entanglement given an input state?

Since we have reasoning and our brains already are quantum neural nets it makes sense that evolution pushed humanity to develop feed forward networks for extrapolation and wisdom, like learning that setting up camp or cooking might attract nearby predators.

The evolution of the ability to use quantum neural nets to extrapolate future timelines based on probabilities is exactly what qubit information processing represents, and knowing that choice A leads to outcome B vs choice C that leads to outcome D allows one to choose a course of action that leads to the best outcome.

What defines an outcome as good is relative to the observer. This is dependent on the training of another neural network, because altruism and selflessness help but one cannot pour from an empty cup, yet greed means one is too busy refilling their own cup and hoarding the water supply to ever go around pouring others.

So ultimately outcomes are determined by intention, and alignment as well as effort influence quantum mechanical outcomes. Intent is an expectation as in Schrodinger's cat, and alignment is making a series of choices using best practices to get a desired outcome. Making other choices would align you with a different outcome.

This is crazy. If France banned Yamakas everyone would say France is AntiSemitic and AntiJewish. That they're fascist and racist.

Married observant Jewish women wear a scarf (tichel or mitpahat), snood, hat, beret, or sometimes a wig (sheitel) in order to conform with the requirement of Jewish religious law that married women cover their hair.

Yet Muslim Women can't do the same thing. France is effectively telling women what they can and cannot wear. Women should be free to wear or not wear whatever they want and still be treated equally no matter what their state of garb may be.

France has no freedom of religion nor do they have any freedom of garment.