z is for zed. #legendary.
season 1: IG @agreeneyedlion
season 2: IG @loveuntilinfinity
season 3: IG @kuramaskywalker
season 4: IG @thefuturebeginswithyou [censored because I covered BLM]
season 4 redo: IG @lavenircommenceravectoi
season 5: IG @allpraiseisduetothemosthigh
season 6: You Are Here
💌 a love note from the author to their future spouse: IG @apasionadamentetuyo
😇 Dat New New, Supervised Dataset 7: IG @loveisintheairbutsoispollution
Shout out:
Eli Rezkallah × Banksy × Dalí × Picasso
Official Audio for "Angel (Take 7)" by Jimi HendrixListen to Jimi Hendrix: https://jimihendrix.lnk.to/listenYDSubscribe to the official Jimi Hendrix YouTube ...
HTTPS://YOUTU.BE/HYNGN-BZRHIIsraeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu addressed a joint session of Congress on Wednesday to defend the ongoing war on Gaza as thousands of people outside protested his appearance. The speech came two months after Karim Khan, the chief prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, announced he was seeking an arrest warrant for Netanyahu for committing war crimes in Gaza. Over 100 Democrats, including Vice President Kamala Harris, skipped the speech, but those in attendance gave Netanyahu numerous standing ovations as he painted a distorted picture of what’s happening in Gaza, making no mention of efforts to reach a ceasefire or the more than 16,000 Palestinian children killed in Israel’s assault. Foreign policy analyst Phyllis Bennis says the speech was “horrifying,” but says it showed that “support for Israel has become a thoroughly partisan issue.” Bennis adds that peace activists in the U.S. have built a broad consensus against the war on Gaza and military support for Israel, and says Vice President Kamala Harris has an opportunity to chart a new path on Middle East policy as she runs for president.
HTTP://WWW.DEMOCRACYNOW.ORG/2024/7/25/NETANYAHU_CONGRESS_WAR_GAZATags: keep your coins i want change
We need a ceasefire deal now. If that meeting doesn't achieve a ceasefire I'll be very disappointed...
Come see me live:Aug 9-11 Arlington, TX https://bit.ly/3UZ2dhVSept 5 Stamford, CT https://bit.ly/3WeMZVESept 18 Tucson, AZ https://bit.ly/3VGrg8EOct 10-12 In...
HTTPS://YOUTU.BE/OMC2GPPZYZMTags: like why the fuck are my private phone calls with my cousin publicly broadcast?, even if a detective got a warrant they can't broadcast the calls, this is beyond abuse of the law, straight up violation
https://legalbeagle.com/6613194-federal-law-penalty-illegal-wiretapping.html
as is:
•••
Using recording devices to record conversations can be a tricky area when it comes to the law. Both states and the federal government have criminal laws that apply in wiretapping cases. These laws impose serious penalties for anyone convicted of illegally wiretapping or recording conversations.
U.S. Code § 2510 et. seq. sets out the federal laws governing wiretapping. The federal laws on wiretapping apply whenever anyone records any conversation, whether it is oral, electronic or over a "wire." A wire communication is defined as any aural transfer aided by use of a wire, cable or other connection that allows two or more speakers to communicate between a point of origin and point of reception.
Read More: Is It Legal to Tape Record Conversations?
Federal law, as well as many state laws, require one-party approval for anyone to legally record telephone or wire conversations. These "one-party consent" laws effectively make it possible for anyone participating in a conversation to record it without asking the other party's permission. If a party is not a part of a conversation, federal law requires that party receive a search warrant or the permission of all parties to record a conversation.
It is illegal to record, use or disclose information through the use of an illegal wire tap or recording device. Anyone found guilty of such a crime faces criminal punishments of up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine for each violation. Civil penalties also apply, including paying for the opposing party's attorney's fees and potential punitive damages.
Federal law enforcement officers can record phone calls and use wiretap devices only after applying for and being granted a warrant by a federal judge or magistrate. Such warrants can only be granted if the law enforcement agency provides the judge with evidence showing probable cause to believe a crime has been or is about to be committed. Such search warrants are typically granted for a period of 30 days, after which they must be renewed by new showings of probable cause.
While federal law allows one-party consent, not all states do. Some states require all parties to consent to the recording of any phone conversation. This complicates matters when dealing with federal wiretapping laws. For example, if one party in a phone conversation lives in a state where one-party consent is allowed but the other lives in a state where it is not, the laws of both states as well as federal law may apply.